-
Website
http://www.GoodieBag.tv -
Original page
http://www.goodiebag.tv/episodes/15_talent.htm -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danswanson
1 comment · 1 points
-
Toria
1 comment · 1 points
-
MacDavid
1 comment · 11 points
-
tefflox
2 comments · 1 points
-
phil campbell
1 comment · 4 points
-
-
Popular Threads
But I have to agree, you have to work A LOT for it to happen!
Ability+Effort+Luck is what needed.Period.
Here's some non-sarcasm for you: stick your Q factor up your tanned ass.
very interesting.
I am in love with your humor...
That is all...for now! mawhahaha!
If you're going to precis someone else's work, you could have just typed a couple of lines.
Filming yourself talking and adding a bit of animation just looks self-indulgent.
You have to enjoy it.
As a musician.... Some people like sitting down and playing guitar to themselves. Those are the talented ones, those who enjoy playing guitar.
If you don't enjoy it from the start then you are never motivated to start the 10,000 hours, you never write good songs because you don't *like* writing good songs, and you never get anywhere.
All the discussion on talent I have ever heard misses out this crucial point. You have to like doing what you do enough to carry on without monetary rewards.
Have you ever heard of anyone 'talented' who always hated what they do?
Are you ruling out the possibility of any innate aptitude? I remember young kids at school who could throw a ball, sing, do a cartwheel, etc whereas others (include me here) could not.
Well, it's not my theory. I'm just having a little fun with it. It's Malcolm Gladwell's argument in "Outliers." But my novice opinion is that innate ability is not that important. I tend to think people who do something a lot get extraordinarily good at it. Tiger Woods is Tiger Woods because his father had him hitting golf balls before they cut the umbilical cord. The kid who does cartwheels has been probably been jumping around her entire life.
Singing is different because we're born with a certain instrument. Certain physical traits -- height and build -- are very important for some sports.
Just my thoughts and I'm no expert!
For further reading, get "Outliers" or "Talent is Overrated," which is more about using these theories for competition in business.
The 10,000 hour theory has been around a while, but as far as I'm aware, the first book it appeared in was Daniel Levitin's "Your Brain on Music." http://tinyurl.com/csxe7x
Though the luck you have is random, the amount you have is variable, and - to fill a nice slot in this theory - is affected by you doing your 10,000 hours. Here's what I mean:
If you sit on your arse (in UK) or ass (in US) all day, sipping beer and watching daytime TV, you will not have much luck. Sure, the man/woman of your dreams may accidentally knock at your door looking for directions, or you may get a call from the 'random million dollar lottery people' but it's unlikely.
However, if you are out there doing stuff, looking through magazines and papers for things, in and out of shops, doing study courses, visiting places of relevance to you, you massively increase the chance of meeting the man/woman of your dreams, but also the guy who's selling a van that you need, or running a course that you want to do, or wants to buy your old guitar, or looking for a new band member, etc. Then everyone else says 'you're so lucky' and you quote Ford and say 'it seems that the harder I work, the more luck I have'.
Got a bit rambly there, but do you get my point? By doing something interesting with your life, you are developing the talent as stated already, but you're also increasing your chance of getting the lucky break anyway.
I'm done.
LeonieB
cybergoth girlie
Either way, I'm fascinated.